Benjamin Thomas George vs Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 07:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Thomas George vs J. Vitor Goncalves Ceolin

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: George 1 - 0 Ceolin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Benjamin Thomas George winning 2 and Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin winning 0. The last match between Benjamin Thomas George and Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin was at the M15 Rochester, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Benjamin Thomas George getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| George | 1 |
| Ceolin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Rochester(07-15-25)
B. T. George vs J. V. G. Ceolin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.94% (40-49) | Career Total W/L | 49.14% (57-59) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. T. George vs J. V. G. Ceolin Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Ceolin winning 44.1% of points compared to George's 37.18%. Is there a significant impact? Yes, it often predicts match outcomes accurately.
- On return stats, George outshines Ceolin by winning 52.51% of second serve return points versus Ceolin’s 47.38%.
- First serve return performance also favors George, who achieves 36.55% compared to Ceolin's 32.15%.
- Pressure handling reveals Ceolin saves 52.83% of breakpoints, slightly more than George’s 50.3%.
- Over the past year, Ceolin has a stronger win ratio at 58.7% against George’s 44.68%.
- Ceolin's best surface is clay with a 53% success rate, while George prefers indoor hard, also with a 53% winning percentage.
- Both players have primarily participated in $10K ITF tournaments, but Ceolin has a better winning record with 61.36% compared to George’s 47.5%.
- Ceolin's opponents have better average rankings (280.78) compared to the average rank of George’s opponents (416.77).
- In deciding sets, Ceolin shows higher success with 64% wins, while George stands at 50%.
- Although George converts 37.9% of breakpoints compared to Ceolin’s 30.88%, the difference is noticeable at key moments in the game.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
Ceolin demonstrates a more robust second serve performance, which frequently correlates with overall match victory predictions. Despite George’s superior performance in return games, particularly when handling first serves, Ceolin’s ability to save breakpoints more effectively in high-pressure situations might prove crucial.
The recent win-loss records indicate Ceolin's stronger form, especially evident with their advantage in deciding set situations and a higher overall winning percentage over the past year.
Ceolin's experience against better-ranked opponents and a slightly better track record in tournaments suggest that they possess the edge in high-stakes matches like this one. Despite the close nature of this matchup, it's likely Ceolin will emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis contest.
Benjamin Thomas George vs Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. T. George vs J. V. G. Ceolin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:13:24 | Average Match Time | 2:13:24 |
| 48% (34/71) | 1st Serve % | 42% (25/59) |
| 68% (23/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (14/25) |
| 49% (18/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (14/34) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (3/12) |
| 53% (31/59) | Return Points Win % | 42% (30/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. T. George Recent Matches Played
J. V. G. Ceolin Recent Matches Played

B. T. George vs J. V. G. Ceolin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.94% (40/49) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.14% (57/59) |
| 44.85% (87/107) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.05% (129/134) |
| 48.76% (848/891) | Games Win/Loss | 49.68% (1238/1254) |
| 41.67% (15/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.86% (12/16) |
| 46.88% (15/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.76% (44/41) |
| 47.62% (10/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 64 | Aces Total | 117 |
| 0.45 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 384 | Total Double Faults | 227 |
| 1:38:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 375.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 268.96 |
| 62% (3232/5189) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2425/3832) |
| 61% (1966/3232) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1505/2425) |
| 44% (853/1957) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (631/1407) |
| 45% (278/611) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (157/410) |
| 44% (2330/5237) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1507/3815) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 46.05% (35/41) | Futures W/L | 50.89% (57/55) |
| 42% (35/83) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (55/114) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 41% (7/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (6/16) |
| 45% (9/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 86% (43/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (56/49) |
| 14% (43/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (56/7) |
| 7% (46/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (60/8) |